Diluting Signal Luck

As I've mentioned in a few of my recent video's, now is a good to reflect, not only on life in general but also on your trading.

What could I have done better?
Am I missing anything?
Are there risks I'm not seeing?

The market will always keep you humble. It seemingly gives you a slap across the face if you're not paying attention.

So here's something that I have been thinking about but maybe have been approaching it from the wrong angle. And thanks to Corey Hoffstein over at investment firm Newfound Research LLC I've had a jolt of common sense. I'll link to some of Corey's excellent research below.

To gain diversification when trading serially correlated instruments, specifically stocks, I have always used a variety of systems across markets and time frames. These include absolute trend, relative momentum, mean reversion, volatility day trading and I'm currently researching a market neutral strategy.

Yet within some of those specific strategies lurks another risk; signal luck.

Let me give you a basic example.

Here the Premium Portfolio is an aggressive monthly rotational momentum strategy. This means it assesses the market and individual stocks once a month and makes a decision whether to remain invested or head to cash.

That portfolio looked at the market at the close of February and decided it was time to go to cash. In hindsight a good decision. The portfolio is -2.5% YTD and in a drawdown circa 15%.

But what if we hadn't exited? What if the strategy had been slightly slower to react and left us holding the portfolio during this downdraft? Well, we'd be -16.6% YTD and in a drawdown of nearer -40%. Not pleasant.

And that's signal risk or timing luck as Corey calls it. Here's some further reading:

The Dumb (Timing) Luck of Smart Beta
A Conversation on Rebalance Timing Luck

So what can we do to dilute signal luck?

From my immediate research we can do at least two things; vary the sensitivity of the rebalance and vary the sensitivity of the regime filter lookback.

For this exercise we'll compare the current monthly portfolio with a weekly variant that also has its regime filter halved, i.e. if the regime filter was set to 200 days in the monthly we'll adjust it to 100 on the weekly.

The CAGR drops from 24.8% to 21.2%. The maxDD is more or less exactly the same so the MAR drops from 1.26 to 1.07. However, the K-Ratio, or smoothness of equity growth is superior on the weekly version.

Next we'll divide the portfolio into 50/50, specifically we'll place 50% of the funds into the monthly rotation and the other 50 into the weekly. In this way we'll be diversifying the signal and the rebalancing.

The CAGR of the combined portfolio moves higher to 23.2% and the drawdown now stands at -19.1%. The K-Ratio declines a little and is on par with the S&P 500.

Whilst executing monthly was designed to lower workload and trading frictions, adding a weekly variant lowers the risks of signal luck considerably without diluting returns a great deal. Being a concentrated portfolio trading frictions remain minimal.

I feel this has been a worthwhile exercise considering 'what could have been' and I'll personally be looking to implement it.

Take care out there. Use your isolation productively.

Nick

settings
REGISTER FOR FREE MOMO 50 LISTS

All content available on this website, www.tradelongterm.com (this “Website”), is general in nature, not directed or tailored to any particular person, and is for informational purposes only.  Neither the Website nor any of its content is offered as investment advice and should not be deemed as investment advice or an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to purchase or sell any specific security.  The information contained on the Website reflects the opinions and projections of the authors of the Website (the “Authors”), which are subject to change without notice at any time.  The Authors do not represent that any opinion or projection will be realized.  Neither the Authors nor any of their affiliates represent that the information presented on this Website is accurate, current, or complete, and such information is subject to change without notice.  Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.  Authors may own the stocks they highlight or discuss and, in fact, do own the stocks contained in the Premium Portfolio.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Rule 4.41

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

This brief statement cannot disclose all of the risks and other significant aspects of securities and derivatives markets.

© Reef Capital Coaching 2020 | AFSL 288200

[bot_catcher]